Abstract:
The purpose of the study is to reveal the content of the terms “OSINT” and “consolidated information”
in the terminological field of information and analytical activity, to identify similarities and differences between
them. Research methodology. General scientific research methods of analysis and synthesis were used; the method
of comparative analysis to compare the essence of the terms OSINT and consolidated information; the method
of content analysis in the study of texts and documents; the hypothetical method to substantiate the synonymity
of the terms OSINT and consolidated information. The scientific novelty lies in the identification of analogies
between the terms “OSINT” and “consolidated information”, which form a terminological series in the scientific
discourse and practical field of information and analytical activities. Conclusions. The terminological field in
the scientific discourse and in the field of practical information and analytical activities is characterised by the
formation of a synonymous series, which includes the terms “OSINT” and “consolidated information”, which are
actually designations of the concept of “information and analytical activities”. An analysis of the content of these
terms shows that the difference is that the content of the concept of “consolidated information” does not indicate a
specific field of activity, while OSINT retains the relevant connotations in the application of the term in other areas.
OSINT in its meaning, regardless of the scope of use in intelligence activities, is a type of information and analytical
activity which is gaining active development in the modern information and communication space to perform a
wide range of tasks in social practice aimed at searching, collecting and analysing information from open (publicly
available) sources which are not classified or restricted.
